LG solves the "last piece of the OLED puzzle" by improving blue pixel efficiency and lifespan

Stozzy

Posts: 12   +1
Staff
The big picture: Among the three pixel colors found in OLED displays, blue stands out for its inefficiency and shorter lifespan compared to red and green pixels. But now LG claims to have cracked that code using a combination of tandem OLEDs and a mix of blue phosphorescent and fluorescent materials. This innovation will lead to better efficiency and improved image stability over the display's lifespan.

LG turned heads when it released the first 55-inch OLED TV back in 2012. OLED technology is renowned for its impressive image quality and low response time compared to LCDs. However, there are some disadvantages, such as high costs and image burn-in. Burn-in occurs when static images (e.g. the Windows taskbar, news tickers, game HUDs) are displayed for an extended period, causing pixels to degrade faster and leaving behind "ghost" images.

Display manufacturers have developed various methods to mitigate burn-in, including pixel dimming on static images to reduce pixel strain and pixel shifting, which slightly moves pixels at regular intervals.

One of the main contributors to burn-in is the blue pixel and how it emits light compared to red or green pixels. OLED pixels are composed of organic material that emits light by either phosphorescence or fluorescence. Phosphorescence is generally more efficient and can degrade more slowly. Red and green pixels in some OLED technologies use phosphorescent emitters, while blue pixels typically emit light through less efficient fluorescence. Because blue pixels require more power to achieve similar luminance to red and green pixels, they degrade faster, contributing to burn-in issues.

LG's "Dream OLED" addresses this challenge by using a two-stack tandem structure, which layers the OLED light-emitting elements. This stacked design employs both fluorescence and phosphorescent materials for blue light. LG estimates that Dream OLED will deliver a 10-20% increase in display efficiency. This improvement in efficiency will reduce pixel stress and extend the lifespan of the blue pixels. Universal Display Corporation, a U.S.-based display material manufacturer, is supplying the blue phosphorescent material.

Also see: The OLED Burn-In Test: Burning It on Purpose

Tandem OLED technology might sound familiar, as Apple introduced a similar concept in their 2024 iPad Pros. Apple's approach involves stacking two OLED layers, which improves brightness and lifespan but doesn't directly address the blue pixel issue. If LG's efficiency estimates are accurate, it's not far-fetched to think that phone makers could be the first to adopt this battery-saving feature.

So, when can consumers expect to get their hands on Dream OLED? According to an industry official, "We plan to evaluate the performance for mass production within the year and review commercialization." While the public may have to wait at least a year or two to see the fruits of LG's efforts, the future of OLED looks bright.

Permalink to story:

 
Still on the fence for Oled gaming panels, reviews of this years new Oled 32 inch panels are great, but we’ve yet to see any longevity reports. Oled is still maturing, and I’ll certainly buy one once all the drawbacks are mitigated
 
Let's just hope this new advancement in OLED technology doesn't end up increasing the overall cost of OLED TVs back to $5000 for just a 50 inch.

LG display has sold it's LCD operations - ( to TCL? )
So they are still going all out on OLED
There maybe a premium in smaller display screens in the short term.
But in the TV space - they have to keep bringing the costs down
They are competing with 100" miniOLED monsters that will get very very good in the next 5 years
Plus Samsungs similar offerings, and a few other companies in this space . Plus Samsungs QD-OLED which will improve and likely to get a MLA boost ( microlens array )
I wanted to go big next year, but think will just get a discounted panasonic Z95a 65", That will hold over for 5 years when I think the big TVs will be so crazy good, that it's enough for me

TVs really have gone down in NZ in the 1970s a 24" colour TV was a huge cost. a LG 83" G4 is relatively cheaper or Samsung S95D 77"
 
Let's just hope this new advancement in OLED technology doesn't end up increasing the overall cost of OLED TVs back to $5000 for just a 50 inch.

Oh, you know it will...every "new" thing in screens jacks the price up for a few years, even if the technology isn't that expensive.
 
Still on the fence for Oled gaming panels, reviews of this years new Oled 32 inch panels are great, but we’ve yet to see any longevity reports. Oled is still maturing, and I’ll certainly buy one once all the drawbacks are mitigated
I believe the party will begin again when Nvidia's new gsync module enters the race with dp2.1 monitors. If they put their brand on the first 12 bit gaming monitors them Titan rtx whales will gobble it up.
 
Next generation tandem oled monitors will be cheaper and more resilient than this generation’s expensive QD-oled monitors by the likes of Alienware and ROG?perhaps brighter as well given that burn in will not be a concern? So basically, hold off on buying an oled monitor?

Copy that.
 
This sounds kinda lame. On paper anyway.
Up until now you almost have to force burn-in and even then... warranties including burn-in exist. Are blue pixels failing in the real world or is this just a preventative measure?
 
My personal opinion, this may solve the brightness issue with OLED, but with 2 layers of OLED, it also kind of double the chance of something failing. There is no perfect solution. Each solution may mitigate some issues but introduce others.
 
Still on the fence for Oled gaming panels, reviews of this years new Oled 32 inch panels are great, but we’ve yet to see any longevity reports. Oled is still maturing, and I’ll certainly buy one once all the drawbacks are mitigated
Well, my semi-longevity report as an early adopter of the first QD-OLED monitor made after 2.5 years of daily mixed use - the AW3423DW - is that I have zero burn-in and no dead pixels. It's the best picture at its resolution on the market. Second best real-world, appreciable upgrade I ever made, behind going from HDD to SSD. But the image quality is SO much more exciting in daily use.
 
Well, my semi-longevity report as an early adopter of the first QD-OLED monitor made after 2.5 years of daily mixed use - the AW3423DW - is that I have zero burn-in and no dead pixels.

The best appreciable upgrade I've ever made, like for most, was going from HDD to SSD. But eye-candy wise, it's wayyy more of a treat.
 
This sounds kinda lame. On paper anyway.
Up until now you almost have to force burn-in and even then... warranties including burn-in exist. Are blue pixels failing in the real world or is this just a preventative measure?

Burn in is real and occurs specifically if you use the panel for gaming and always for the same TV channels: by default TVs have the energy saving and burn in prevention modes on, which makes the panel much dimmer daily AND the pixel refresh will also dim the panel over time. If you turn everything off or at least the energy saving and use the panel fully, you will in 2-3 years notice the first burn in marks really want to have a new TV in 5 years max.

On my S95B I turned off the energy savings but the pixel refresh and other prevention methods are on. I also don’t watch TV frequently and I let SDR brightness relatively low (for TV channels) so I hope my panel lasts long enough.

My personal opinion, this may solve the brightness issue with OLED, but with 2 layers of OLED, it also kind of double the chance of something failing. There is no perfect solution. Each solution may mitigate some issues but introduce others.

With every new tech it can happen, but that is not the goal: with every new tech you should get better performance. OLED screens come a long way and the image quality, brightness and longevity are much better. You can have peak brightnesses from over 1600 nits which was impossible some years ago.

In a near future with this new blue OLED and MLA and eventually better heat dissipation, you’ll get more brightness for longer periods and less stress for the OLED elements. That will make you happy over time.
 
Burn in is real and occurs specifically if you use the panel for gaming and always for the same TV channels: by default TVs have the energy saving and burn in prevention modes on, which makes the panel much dimmer daily AND the pixel refresh will also dim the panel over time. If you turn everything off or at least the energy saving and use the panel fully, you will in 2-3 years notice the first burn in marks really want to have a new TV in 5 years max.

On my S95B I turned off the energy savings but the pixel refresh and other prevention methods are on. I also don’t watch TV frequently and I let SDR brightness relatively low (for TV channels) so I hope my panel lasts long enough.



With every new tech it can happen, but that is not the goal: with every new tech you should get better performance. OLED screens come a long way and the image quality, brightness and longevity are much better. You can have peak brightnesses from over 1600 nits which was impossible some years ago.

In a near future with this new blue OLED and MLA and eventually better heat dissipation, you’ll get more brightness for longer periods and less stress for the OLED elements. That will make you happy over time.
I know how burn-in works.
 
Back