Microsoft finally addresses FAT32 partition size limit with latest Windows 11 build

Shawn Knight

Posts: 15,429   +193
Staff member
In brief: It's taken nearly three decades but Microsoft is finally increasing the FAT32 size limit. The long overdue change isn't widespread just yet – it's only available to Windows 11 insiders using the latest Canary release – but as they say, better late than never, right?

FAT, short for file allocation table, is a file system that was originally designed for floppy disks. FAT eventually found its way to hard drives and other storage mediums, and was the default file system for several Microsoft operating systems until the switch to NTFS in 2001 with Windows XP.

According to former Windows developer Dave W Plummer, who came up with the familiar format dialog box in late 1994, it was meant to be a simple placeholder that would suffice until a more elegant UI arrive. Well, that never happened, and Plummer's temporary solution became permanent.

In an X post on the subject, Plummer said he was also responsible for coming up with "how much "cluster stack" would be too much," which ultimately constrained the format size to 32GB.

Now some 30 years later, Microsoft is finally getting around to addressing the size limit. The latest Canary release of Windows 11 (build 27686) increases the FAT32 size limit from 32GB to a much more modern 2TB. Note that this only applies to formatting disks from the command line using the format command. With any luck, Microsoft will eventually update the GUI path as well.

Windows has supported reading FAT32 partitions up to 2TB in size for a while now, but you needed a third-party tool to create it. It is also worth noting that files stored on a drive formatted with FAT32 have a size limit of 4GB each.

FAT32 isn't nearly as popular as it once was, having been replaced by more modern file systems like NTFS and exFAT. Still, plenty of USB drives and SD cards still use the format, and it's about time that Microsoft upped the size limit.

Permalink to story:

 
NTFS started with Windows 2000 not XP.

Oh contrary mong bong amee, NTFS started with Windows NT 3.1, released 27 July 1993. While it was used in Windows 2000, that didn't come until 17 February 2000.

However, the NTFS version released with NT 3.1 (NTFS 1.0) is incompatible with later releases, so a case could be made that "true compatible" NTFS (NTFS 1.1) didn't come till Windows NT 3.5 in 1994.
 
Annoyingly I've been using Minitool Partition Wizard to format my 128GB thumb drives to FAT32 so I can take a bunch of movies semi-regularly around to my parents place for them to watch on their "Dumb" TV (with built in media player)..
The 4GB limit is annoying as I have to downsize a lot of my 4K movies to fit under that limit (although with their eye-sight the 1080p profile isnt any different to them)
I'd hook them up to my PLEX server except I'm on CGNAT internet and getting around that is fine for tech-savy people, but my parents wouldn't have a clue how to do things on their modem... and they don't own a PC or Laptop.
The old FAT32 Thumb Drive option is the lowest tech solution for their aging needs.
 
If they wont increase the size from 4GB file to at least 20 or more there is no use Ill use exFAT.
 
I wonder, is this backwards compatible? Are older Windows versions able to read and write to FAT32 partitions formatted beyond the 32GB limit?

To be honest, I don't see much point in this. Why would anyone use such an unreliable filesystem on partitions larger than 30GB... imagine the mess a heavily used 2TB FAT32 partition will quickly become. exFAT might not be as solid as NTFS but it's much better.

Still, I guess it's nice to see Microsoft making a change in Windows than adds something potentially useful for some people for a change, instead of removing features, randomly changing UI elements again or adding useless crap.
 
If they wont increase the size from 4GB file to at least 20 or more there is no use Ill use exFAT.
Not all devices support it. My LG Smart TV only supports FAT32. Still, it's an antique, being 7 years old, so newer ones may be better.
 
Back