Nicolas Cage plays John Madden in Amazon's upcoming "Madden" biopic

Cal Jeffrey

Posts: 4,281   +1,479
Staff member
In context: Nicolas Cage recently played the most challenging role of his career as the titular serial killer in Longlegs. The 42-year veteran actor now faces an arguably more difficult role portraying John Madden in the upcoming Amazon biopic "Madden."

On Thursday, Amazon MGM Studios announced that Nicolas Cage will portray the late football legend John Madden in an upcoming film directed and co-written by David O. Russell. Although the feature is billed as a biopic, The Hollywood Reporter notes that insiders described it as "the origin story of Madden NFL," the video game franchise.

"Nicolas Cage, one of our greatest and most original actors, will portray the best of the American spirit of originality, fun, and determination in which anything is possible as beloved national legend John Madden," Russell said in a casting reveal.

Nic Cage is one of my favorite actors, but I have difficulty picturing him as John Madden. It's a role seemingly tailor-made for comedian Frank Caliendo, whose Madden impersonations (below) made him a household name. I get that Russell was looking for a serious actor rather than a comedian, but why not? Last year, Deadline noted that the director was considering Saturday Night Live alum Will Ferrell for the role.

Madden was a character unto himself. His mannerisms, quips, and iconic voice are all a bit funny if you think about it. PC Gamer's Wes Fenlon points to one of his favorite John Madden lines from the movie The Replacements.

"I love to see a fat guy score."

"Why?"

"Because first you get a fat guy spike, and then you get the fat guy dance!"

That's John Madden playing John Madden. He doesn't need a script because he made silly remarks his trademark in color commentary for 30 years. He was the master of overexplaining a play and coming up with obscure factoids and anecdotes about players that nobody ever questioned because he was the legendary John Madden.

Madden never played pro football because of a knee injury suffered during training with the Philadelphia Eagles in 1958. Instead, he became one of the youngest head coaches in the NFL when he signed on with the Oakland Raiders in 1969 at age 32. It was the only team he would coach in his 10 years on the field. He retired with a record of 112-39-7 in 1979, making him one of the most successful coaches in NFL history.

Shortly after starting his new career as an NLF commentator, Madden approached video game publisher Electronic Arts with an idea for a football game. This seed eventually became Madden NFL, which launched its first game in 1988 on the Apple II, MS-DOS, Commodore 64, and Commodore 128. Barring 1989, EA has released at least one new Madden NFL game every year for over 30 years, making it one of the longest actively-running video game franchises ever.

Although HR's anonymous sources describe it as a video game origin story, viewers shouldn't go into it thinking it will be like Joh S. Baird's Tetris movie. While the Madden NFL franchise is a fun part of the legendary coach's life, David O. Russell's treatment seems to focus more on the man and his earlier life with the Raiders.

"Together with the ferocious style, focus, and inspired individualism of Al Davis, owner of the underdog Oakland Raiders, the feature will be about the joy, humanity and genius that was John Madden in a wildly inventive, cool world of the 1970s," Russell said, seemingly contradicting claims that it's a Madden NFL origin story.

Regardless of the plot, whether you are a fan of the video game, the NFL, or the man himself, the movie should prove entertaining, even if only to see Cage's personification of the late football legend. There's no word on a release date yet, but HR claims the project is "nearing the end zone." I can't wait to see a trailer.

Image credit: Nicolas Genin

Permalink to story:

 
Good Luck. All actors have been in dogs. I am a Cage fan

Cage and Ben Stiller get a lot of hate - most movies don't need to be critical master pieces, people just want some entertainment. I liked him in Lord of War, entertaining while if you want it , had a social commentary about it or at least historical reflection for the time. I really wanted to travel Central Asia right after the breakup of the USSR, but was elsewhere. It wasn't just weapons that were moved out of USSR but relics, treasures etc

Can stand the later Alan Alda push some morality down your throat at the expense of entertainment. Weird as original early M*A*S*H used just dark comedy well to already do that
 
I liked him in Lord of War,

One of my favorite Cage vehicles. I love when the Warlord shoots his guard for flirting then says...The youth of today or something similar.
Can stand the later Alan Alda push some morality down your throat at the expense of entertainment. Weird as original early M*A*S*H used just dark comedy well to already do that

I liked MASH originally but soured on the episode when Hawkeye chewed out a fighter pilot because a bomb hurt a N Korean kid. Why wasn't he mad at N Korea? It's preachy garbage like that which processed me into a conservative.
 
I liked MASH originally but soured on the episode when Hawkeye chewed out a fighter pilot because a bomb hurt a N Korean kid. Why wasn't he mad at N Korea? It's preachy garbage like that which processed me into a conservative.
A TV show?
Anyway, he didn't get on him for dropping the bombs, he got on him to show him what affects it can have on innocents.
Damn Bob, talk about impressionable.
 
he didn't get on him for dropping the bombs, he got on him to show him what affects it can have on innocents.
Damn Bob, talk about impressionable.
And so we left North Korea, at which point the country put half its population into slave-labor camps, and began starving several hundred thousand of them to death each year -- many of them children. Had we dropped a few more bombs, that could have all been prevented.

Those fighter pilots were risking their lives fighting against evil. They certainly didn't deserve to be trashed by some ignorant sanctimonious twit of an TV actor.
 
And so we left North Korea, at which point the country put half its population into slave-labor camps, and began starving several hundred thousand of them to death each year -- many of them children. Had we dropped a few more bombs, that could have all been prevented.

Those fighter pilots were risking their lives fighting against evil. They certainly didn't deserve to be trashed by some ignorant sanctimonious twit of an TV actor.
Don't forget that M*A*SH was really about the Vietnam war, even though it was set in the Korean war.
 
And so we left North Korea, at which point the country put half its population into slave-labor camps, and began starving several hundred thousand of them to death each year -- many of them children. Had we dropped a few more bombs, that could have all been prevented.
That is single-handedly the dumbest damn thing I have heard in years.
That is just pitiful. Ariel attacks result in multitudes more civilian casualties than ground, especially vs. its effectiveness. And YOU want more bombs and rockets?
All we need to do is look at Russia's self-destruction tour in Ukraine to see how full of bullshit you are. And when was the last time we heard of Israel ground troops smashing down from the sky and destroying hospitals, playgrounds, or food and supply service trucks.
Stupid thing to say, how many would be surprised that it came from you?

Those fighter pilots were risking their lives fighting against evil. They certainly didn't deserve to be trashed by some ignorant sanctimonious twit of an TV actor.
It was a TV show. And he didn't trash the pilot. He just wanted to show him what can result from blind air attacks.
I looked it up actually, and here is verbatim whet he said to the actor pilot.

"Look, you seem like a decent guy. Too decent to think this can be anything like a clean war."

Sure, whiny material for MAGA world, but in the real world, that is NOT trashing.

If anyone is curious. MASH, Season 5, Episode 8. "Dear Sigmund".
 
That is single-handedly the dumbest damn thing I have heard in years. Ariel [sic] attacks result in multitudes more civilian casualties than ground, especially vs. its effectiveness. And YOU want more bombs and rockets?
The "dumbest thing" I've heard in years is the notion you can fight a modern war entirely on the ground, ignoring air power entirely. This isn't 1905 any longer. Do you even understand what the role of fighters, fighter-bombers, and close-air support are? Do you think we could have won WW2, without bombing factories and supply lines behind the German lines?

Furthermore and unsurprisingly, your beliefs are 100% incorrect. The ratio of civilian to military casualties has declined dramatically in modern warfare -- thanks mostly to those smart "bombs and rockets", rather than the indiscriminate cannon and artillery fire that ground troops used in wars from the Crimean War and US Civil War to the "Great War" itself.

he didn't trash the pilot. He just wanted to show him what can result from blind air attacks.
The basis of the entire episode was that the US -- and these pilots -- were blindly dropping bombs on civilian villages, killing and injuring small children. A fictitious, mindlessly banal viewpoint. Alda literally dragged out a soapbox and stood on it so he could sanctimoniously preach his moral superiority to the audience.

And when was the last time we heard of Israel ground troops mashing down from the sky and destroying hospitals, playgrounds, or food and supply service trucks.
That's pretty much on a daily basis in Gaza. When Israel killed a Hamas terror leader in Iran, did they send in ground troops -- or did they use air power?
 
Last edited:
The "dumbest thing" I've heard in years is the notion you can fight a modern war entirely on the ground, ignoring air power entirely.
And here we have once again, you. I never said entirely on the ground. NOBODY thinks that.
In fact all I did was give the cold hard facts to the Techspot expert at ignoring them.

Do you think we could have won WW2, without bombing factories and supply lines behind the German lines?
See my answer above. And now I get to see more of your comments on stuff I never said.

Furthermore and unsurprisingly, your beliefs are 100% incorrect. The ratio of civilian to military casualties has declined dramatically in modern warfare
And I always have known that, having served myself right out of high school and before college.
But then of course, I never said that was false now did I?
But you still said "my beliefs" are wrong. But what is the word for being wrong about something I never said?

The basis of the entire episode was that the US -- and these pilots -- were blindly dropping bombs on civilian villages
No. That was YOUR basis. And never once was your comment mentioned in that episode.
I looked it up on Hulu and watched it.

A fictitious, mindlessly banal viewpoint
Never, have I heard one person describe himself so honestly and accurately.

That's pretty much on a daily basis in Gaza. When Israel killed a Hamas terror leader in Iran, did they send in ground troops -- or did they use air power?
My God, you are deficient. Not that anyone ever mentioned a targeted strike on a person, and you would certainly not mention that no civilians were killed, but just to remind you, the entire basis of my comments was collateral human deaths.
And not once, have you actually addressed that.

But you know the drill by now. Take the last word. I am not going to poison Techspot by arguing with the likes of you on subjects I didn't even talk about. OR your usual answer with zero comments on what I, or anyone else actually did say, I'm not playing those sick little games with you.
Anyone that wants to review what I said is MORE than welcome.
As for you, please just go make up something else and post it here. It is wonderful fiction with zero actual commentary worth thinking about.

MASH, Season 5, Episode 8. "Dear Sigmund"
 
Last edited:
But you still said "my beliefs" are wrong. But what is the word for being wrong about something I never said?
Your own words: " Ariel [sic] attacks result in multitudes more [sic] civilian casualties than ground". And: "YOU want more bombs and rockets?" ... all in response to my defending US pilots in Korea. For shame.

As for your unremitting defense of that episode, here's a bit more of it:

Potter (examining a badly injured child):
Someone dropped a bomb on her village from an airplane.
Captain Hathaway (the Pilot):
...was it one of theirs or one of ours?
Potter:
What difference does that make?

This is the same sickening moral relativism that sees no difference between a terrorist murdering a hostage, vs. a policeman accidently shooting someone while trying to free those hostages. But wait, it gets worse! Hawkeye places the pilot in a bed next to the child, so the pilot can better understand the evil he's committing by fighting North Korea:

Captain Hathaway:
You put me there on purpose, didn't you? ... You're a real S.O.B., you know that?
Hawkeye:
Look, you seem like a decent guy, too decent to think this can be anything like a clean war.
Captain Hathaway (face expressing the realization of his guilt):
From up there, it is... was. She's just a little baby. (chokes up) Sorry.

Nothing but a cold, hard slap in the face for any pilot who ever served in that war. Don't bother trying to deny it.
 
" Ariel [sic] attacks
Ah, excellent catch. My spell checker blew it and I didn't check it.
Did you know, spell checking a poster is the last refuge of a weak argument?
But at least it gave you something factual to write. For once.
Actually, you could just pretend that The Little Mermaid runs the show for all bomb, rocket and drone attacks.
I mean, that still makes more sense than most of what you spit out.
 
Last edited:
Apparently, for a lot of people the Korean War lives up to the name "Forgotten War."
True. Coincidentally, I met one of the very few that were awarded a VC in the Korean war before he passed away a few years ago, and TBH that's probably one of the few reasons it stays on my radar (no MASH pun intended), that and the amusing little film 'Welcome to Dongmakgol' .
 
Back