New potassium-ion battery technology could soon replace lithium-ion

Given all the money being thrown at R&D, that's not shocking. The issue has always been *production*; Lithiums been around forever so the production costs are far lower.
For the young people out there. R&D money has been "thrown" at battery technology since the beginning of the 20th century. There actually have not been any real "revolutions" in the technology, merely evolutionary developments (taking 100+ years) - the reason that the cost of energy performance of batteries has increased has been largely due to more efficient and larger economy of scale manufacturing (setting minimum car sales, taking years to reach a small profit target) - and electrical engineers that packaged small (easy to produce and quality control) batteries into battery packs (4500 to 5000 batteries per car. The underlying technology has not changed that much.
 
Every 6 months for literally my entire life there has been reports of a "revolutionary new battery technology". In 30+ years those stories have been true exactly twice: LiFePO4 and Li-ion. Everything else has been an innovation within that same basic family of chemistries. We get promised new batteries more often than we're told that a "first of it's kind device harvests water from the air" will magically suddenly be effective in places where the air has essentially no water.... using the same technology that essentially dates back to the Incan Empire. It's a classic cycle of yellow journalism.

But here's why acting like Potassium batteries are some miracle of science is particularly ridiculous: potassium batteries already existed. They were a stepping stone to lithium that never left the prototype stage, because it was discovered immediately that lithium did more or less the same thing as Potassium, except better in every way. It held more energy, was lighter, cheaper, easier to produce, and needed less materials.
Almost everybody has seen this with our own eyes in high school chemistry. The teacher drops sodium, potassium, and lithium in water, and we all see how much more energetically lithium reacts.
Of all the materials we could reasonably use in a battery even remotely similar to what we have, lithium has been proven to be the best, repeatedly, for decades. What we currently have is near the physical limits of what we think is theoretically possible for stable, rechargeable energy storage regardless of the chemistry used.
The next major innovation in electric storage is either going to be so radically different that it wouldn't be considered a battery in the way we currently define what a battery is... Or it's going to be barred from civilian use, as the chemistry would double as a high explosive.
So in other words, give up. it's never going to happen.
True. But the truth of the lab R&D has not changed. They are always after the holy grail and are always stating that they have found the "magic pixie dust"
Every 6 months for literally my entire life there has been reports of a "revolutionary new battery technology". In 30+ years those stories have been true exactly twice: LiFePO4 and Li-ion. Everything else has been an innovation within that same basic family of chemistries. We get promised new batteries more often than we're told that a "first of it's kind device harvests water from the air" will magically suddenly be effective in places where the air has essentially no water.... using the same technology that essentially dates back to the Incan Empire. It's a classic cycle of yellow journalism.

But here's why acting like Potassium batteries are some miracle of science is particularly ridiculous: potassium batteries already existed. They were a stepping stone to lithium that never left the prototype stage, because it was discovered immediately that lithium did more or less the same thing as Potassium, except better in every way. It held more energy, was lighter, cheaper, easier to produce, and needed less materials.
Almost everybody has seen this with our own eyes in high school chemistry. The teacher drops sodium, potassium, and lithium in water, and we all see how much more energetically lithium reacts.
Of all the materials we could reasonably use in a battery even remotely similar to what we have, lithium has been proven to be the best, repeatedly, for decades. What we currently have is near the physical limits of what we think is theoretically possible for stable, rechargeable energy storage regardless of the chemistry used.
The next major innovation in electric storage is either going to be so radically different that it wouldn't be considered a battery in the way we currently define what a battery is... Or it's going to be barred from civilian use, as the chemistry would double as a high explosive.
So in other words, give up. it's never going to happen.
But as with all R&D labs, in my 40 years experience, its all is good because they have found the "magic pixie dust" call 'Kristonite" which when sprinkled on lead will change it into gold - or potassium into "super-potassium" as the case may be - violating all of the conservation of matter/energy laws in nature but there you go. Just because life and humans exist because of the "pixie dust" called enzymes does not mean that we know how they were created or know how to create any ourselves.
 
Dont be "fanboy" when reporting the"news" or sensationalist (does Techspot really want to be the new National Enquirer?).
In this case spreading unsubstantiated marketing material. Try at least to do some "fact checking" as many of the comments have done BEFORE publishing.
 
I just leased a Hyundai Ionic 6 (the same e-GMP electric platform as the Ionic 5/Kia EV6) that is a very nice car with edgy styling. It's about the same size as my previous Hyundai Sonata except with sloping roofline and aerodynamic trunk has very little cargo space. Excellent passenger cabin front and rear. I have the AWD Long Range battery model (77.4 kwh, 320 HP, 446 lb-ft torque, 18" wheels, nominal range 316 miles, and drag CD of .21). It is a true hot rod sports car with 255/55/R18 wheels but GVW is 4500 lbs (a 1000 lbs more than my similarly sized ICE Sonata). It needs those wide aspect wheels to support the weight. If you step on it flies as its 0-60 of 4.5 and max speed (probably governor) of 115. Has Z-rated tires. It also cost $50K (MSRP) and only got it due to $10K Hyundai Motor cash and 7K equity trade in to bring it down to a $320/month lease for 33 mo. Normally, this car is WAY out of my price range but am really enjoying it and don't do much long range travel (longest trip is 90 mi (180 rt) to airport. Was originally buying a hybrid (for 37K) when this came along. Great car but I expect a $50K car to be great in some(all?) of its aspects. Don't drive far enough to need a level 2 (about $2k more with installation as its a 240V product) so the 120V charges at 1.5kwh/hour so 50 hours to full and only add about 18% overnight (12 hours). If I had a decent commute wouldn't be able to get by with just a 120V charger although there are some Electrify America fast DC (DCFC) chargers nearby that would "fill me up" in about 15-18 minutes and have 2 years of "free" (30 minutes per day) charging on their system. EVs have a long way to go but this car is a great driving car and very unique (only 20,000 total sold across US estimated for this year) and Porsche like designs. It's spacious, quiet, comfortable, will beat anything gas powered except 600 HP Vettes, etc. and 300 miles is plenty of range for my needs. Long way until they beat Hybrids (which are selling like hot cakes) since they don't have any compromises and get 40 mpg for big vehicles (Toyota Highlander, Kia Pallisade and almost 50 for Camrys, Accords, Sonatas and mid 50 mpgs for Priuses (Corolla sized). The Hybrids are either cost neutral or only a couple grand more than ICE vehicles with no compromises on regular driving and much, much better MPG from day 1. Batteries on my car will lose 1-2%/year and don't want to be left holding the bag when the replacement battery issue comes up (proponents claim 200,000 but how much range have you lost by then (20-30%??) and $15-20K replacement (way more than value of car by then - so are they going straight to land fill?) I'll enjoy this one while I have it and see - will definitely be gone before warranty runs out (10 years/100,000 miles).
 
Back