Google's Reimagine AI tool works well, perhaps too well, so it can be easily abused

zohaibahd

Posts: 378   +5
Staff
Masterful gambit, sir: Google's new Pixel 9 phones hit the market this month, a full two months ahead of schedule. It's almost as if Google couldn't wait to show off all the AI packed into these devices. By launching early, they've gained a head start on Apple Intelligence features coming to the iPhone 16. However, in their haste, Google may have opened a can of worms โ€“ one that could potentially backfire spectacularly.

One of the Pixel 9's standout features, the Reimagine tool, is already facing criticism from reviewers. This innovative feature is part of Google Photos' Magic Editor and allows you to simply type a description of how you want a photo to look, and it will apply that vision to the image. While it seems designed for innocent edits like changing a sunny day to a snowy scene or adding and removing people or objects, it has a darker side.

The Verge tested the tool and found it to be surprisingly effective โ€“ perhaps too effective. They discovered that it can easily be used to insert objectionable or disturbing content into images. This includes things like car wrecks, smoking bombs in public places, sheets appearing to cover bloody corpses, and drug paraphernalia.

In one example, they managed to alter a real photo of a person in a living room, making it appear as if they were doing drugs.

People have had the ability to doctor photos using editing software to manipulate public opinion or for other nefarious purposes for decades. However, this process required significant skills and time to make the fakes look convincing. Reimagine, on the other hand, makes it incredibly easy for anyone with a Pixel 9 to create similar images.

The Verge envisions a scenario where bad actors could quickly churn out fake but believable visuals related to events like scandals, wars, or disasters, spreading misinformation in real time before the truth has a chance to surface. They even suggest that "the default assumption about a photo is about to become that it's faked because creating realistic and believable fake photos is now trivial to do."

To be clear, The Verge isn't labeling the Pixel 9 as a villainous tool designed to produce misinformation at scale. However, it does serve as an example of how easily things can spiral out of control. While Google will likely work to address these issues with Reimagine, much like they did with Gemini's image generator, other companies offering similar tools may not be as diligent in implementing safeguards.

Unfortunately, the Pixel 9's AI-related concerns don't stop there. The phone also includes a new Pixel Studio app that allows users to generate entirely synthetic imagery through AI, and it appears to lack adequate safeguards.

Digital Trends demonstrated that it's possible to create images of copyrighted characters in offensive scenarios, such as Spongebob depicted as a Nazi, Mickey Mouse as a slave owner, and Paddington Bear on a crucifix. That's a double whammy of controversy. Even more concerning, the images generated by this app don't seem to carry any clear watermarks to indicate that they are artificially created.

While it's commendable that Google is innovating and pushing the boundaries of AI, there are still significant gaps despite the company's claims of having robust safeguards in place.

Image credit: The Verge, Digital Trends

Permalink to story:

 
What a sh1t world these megacorporation's - especially Google, Meta, MS, Twitter and Apple - are creating for us to navigate.
Hell yeah, it's a world where the people that combine extreme entitlement, with legendary levels of laziness are coming into power. I heard an ad recently that proclaimed "remember when you had to type to search".
Golly, I wonder if it's related to the childhood\young adult obesity levels.
 
Hell yeah, it's a world where the people that combine extreme entitlement, with legendary levels of laziness are coming into power. I heard an ad recently that proclaimed "remember when you had to type to search".
Golly, I wonder if it's related to the childhood\young adult obesity levels.
You get a Blue Ribbon for your comment!

My point is trying to treat everyone the same, no winners or losers in kids games, for example, has warped expectations. It's really a shame.

Participant trophies for all!
 
Good, lets not restrict everything to the max. I've had a hard time having to rephrase prompts trying to avoid triggering a "sorry I cannot do that". If I want to create a drunk driving Elmo raking up the body count just let me.

I don't need some overly cautiously baby state nonsense from big tech. The tech is there already anyway, if Google doesn't let you someone else will. Some kind of unobtrusive watermark sure, but please stop making everything so overprotected that it gets frustrating to use it normally. (Or by being overly woke as we have seen a while back: https://www.techspot.com/news/10198...after-gemini-creates-inaccurate-racially.html).

The world is a crappy place with crappy people in it. Stop trying to hide it with being overly politically correct.
 
Last edited:
Or by being overly woke as we have seen a while back
Almost a great post until that bit, unfortunately.
Just showing another clueless that has no idea where woke came from.
But let me quote this, and MAYBE you can get some actual thoughts on the subject:

"๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜ ๐—ฏ๐˜† ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜†.
๐—•๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—น๐˜‚๐˜๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—˜๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ ๐˜€๐—น๐˜‚๐—ฟ
๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜ ๐˜€๐—ผ ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ด๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฑ"
 
If they make the rules any tighter it won't do basic functions... It already always tells me it can't edit people when I try erase a background object even when it's not a person.

The issue is the rules were pointless. If someone wants to use an uncensored tool it's easier to find then getting Google's AI to work properly.

Google must have some terrible rule sets or their data is bad because.. even 2 year old LLM models from basically everyone else aren't as temperamental as Google's
 
Almost a great post until that bit, unfortunately.
Just showing another clueless that has no idea where woke came from.
But let me quote this, and MAYBE you can get some actual thoughts on the subject:

"๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜ ๐—ฏ๐˜† ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜†.
๐—•๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—น๐˜‚๐˜๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—˜๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ ๐˜€๐—น๐˜‚๐—ฟ
๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜ ๐˜€๐—ผ ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ด๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฑ"
There is a big difference between woke and what's generally considered progressive ideals or being a decent person.

Woke is something else entirely which is the issue and it's irrelevant when the word woke may or may not have evolved to refer to this ideology. We could always go back to them calling themselves SJW but then they got mad other people called them that and went to woke and now they get bothered when people use woke.

Shifting goal posts as it were.
 
There is a big difference between woke and what's generally considered progressive ideals or being a decent person.
That is my point. Just being so lazy as to forget that woke was first coined for people that consider equal rights and protections under the law basic human rights, and should not have the same descriptive as the people that want to heavily regulate gas stoves.
But the right is so easily confused.
 
Almost a great post until that bit, unfortunately.
Just showing another clueless that has no idea where woke came from.
But let me quote this, and MAYBE you can get some actual thoughts on the subject:

"๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜ ๐—ฏ๐˜† ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜†.
๐—•๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—น๐˜‚๐˜๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—˜๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ ๐˜€๐—น๐˜‚๐—ฟ
๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜ ๐˜€๐—ผ ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ด๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฑ"
Woke is a self-destructive disease that has brought Corporations down, ruined small businesses, and destroyed the US education system. All for an ideology that is part and parcel of Bolshevism.
 
Back