AMD Radeon RX 8000 'RDNA 4' graphics card spotted with Navi 48 GPU and 16GB memory

DragonSlayer101

Posts: 464   +2
Staff
Something to look forward to: Team Red will launch its Radeon RX 8000 graphics cards next year with a new RDNA 4 architecture. While a few leaks have already provided some insight into the next-gen GPUs, a new listing on a benchmarking website has now revealed some key specifications of what could be the flagship RDNA 4 graphics card.

The GPU appears on Geekbench with a GFX1201 device ID, suggesting it is an RDNA 4 SKU. For reference, RDNA 3 desktop cards have GFX11XX device IDs, and the RDNA 3.5 SKUs are designated GFX115X. Similarly, RDNA 2 cards use GFX103X IDs, while RDNA 1 GPUs are GFX101X.

The device ID suggests that the listed graphics card has the Navi 48 GPU, which will likely power the flagship RX 8000-series card next year. Geekbench lists it with 28 compute units, which could suggest 56 CUs and 3,584 Stream Processors if AMD retains the RDNA 3 configuration of a shader engine with dual compute engines for each work group processor.

The listing also shows a 2,101MHz clock speed, much slower than the 2.5GHz-2.6GHz boost clocks on the current RDNA 3 GPUs. If anything, the RDNA 4 cards should offer even higher frequencies than their RDNA 3 counterparts as they will use a more modern process node and a fresh new architecture.

Finally, the Radeon RX 8000 graphics card is listed with 16GB of memory, which matches the amount of VRAM found on the RX 7800 XT and RX 7900 GRE. The listing does not mention the speed or memory type, but rumors suggest it could sport GDDR6.

It is worth noting that Geekbench listed multiple instances of the Radeon RX 8000, and none of the scores are that impressive. The highest OpenCL score is 33,241, which is lower than the numbers racked up by the GTX 1650 and several times lower than the scores achieved by the RX 7900XTX. The disappointing benchmark scores suggest we're looking at a very early engineering sample, meaning it's still a work in progress. Either way, AMD still has a lot of fine-tuning to do before the next-gen cards are ready for prime time.

Permalink to story:

 
It'll be an engineering sample. I'm sure the real thing will be 7900XT/4070ti raster performance with hopefully similar RT performance but we shall have to wait and see.
 
It'll be an engineering sample. I'm sure the real thing will be 7900XT/4070ti raster performance with hopefully similar RT performance but we shall have to wait and see.
Well given the core count and AMDs track record, I'll take that bet. It'll be slower then a 7900 gre in raster and RT performance will be on par with a current 7800xt.
 
It'll be an engineering sample. I'm sure the real thing will be 7900XT/4070ti raster performance with hopefully similar RT performance but we shall have to wait and see.
Well the price is my concern, cause if with that performance and around 450 MSRP then I would pull the trigger xD
 
RDOA 4: 16 giga when nvidea gives 24, DDR6 when nvidea gives D6X :(

But at what price point?

Currently the 16 gb cards made by AMD are at the same price level as 12 gb nvidia.
I imagine the new gen will be priced similar.

And sure there will be a bigger better Nvidia card, but most of us aren't willing to pay 1000+ dollars for a GPU.
So for most gamers, this might be a great card.
 
16GB RDNA4 could be a hit priced at $399 against 8GB Blackwell, but unfortunately will probably be priced at $599 against 12GB Blackwell since AMD for whatever reason is convinced that the perceived value fallacy is a viable strategy against nVidia...
 
16GB RDNA4 could be a hit priced at $399 against 8GB Blackwell, but unfortunately will probably be priced at $599 against 12GB Blackwell since AMD for whatever reason is convinced that the perceived value fallacy is a viable strategy against nVidia...
Being a loss leader has not done them any favors, so they may as well make the GPU division profitable from what few buyers they can muster.
 
OOOH, 16GB of VRAM! Way to pave the way forward, RDNA4 :sleeping:
If it slots into the price point of the current RX 7700 XT and performs faster and has 16GB VRAM, that is progress. It will (most likely) offer more VRAM and performance than Nvidia's similarly priced card as their current cards already do this.

The rumours suggest there's no high end RDNA 4 card, so the current RX 7900 XT/XTX won't get direct replacements and may well remain as the fastest Radeon GPU's next year.
 
If it slots into the price point of the current RX 7700 XT and performs faster and has 16GB VRAM, that is progress. It will (most likely) offer more VRAM and performance than Nvidia's similarly priced card as their current cards already do this.

The rumours suggest there's no high end RDNA 4 card, so the current RX 7900 XT/XTX won't get direct replacements and may well remain as the fastest Radeon GPU's next year.
The price of the 7900xtx is dropping although slowly down to $899 from Newegg and Amazon currently. For reference as of 8/27/24.


7900xt as low as $674.99 with code $15.00 off w/ promo code: VGAEXCSAET875, ends 8/31



 
At what point will nVidia say screw it, let's relaunch 4k series all over again or maybe 3k-v2 (give others little hope to match up) as others falling more and more behind. Or, I guess low-cost entry level becomes AMD and Intel's thing with mid, upper, and enthusiast level gaming GPUs are premium priced nVidia the way it's meant to be played market (as they like to say). When the next gen cards all launch, this time around, it could be the best AMD cards will be 5060 level at top end.
 
But at what price point?

Currently the 16 gb cards made by AMD are at the same price level as 12 gb nvidia.
I imagine the new gen will be priced similar.

And sure there will be a bigger better Nvidia card, but most of us aren't willing to pay 1000+ dollars for a GPU.
So for most gamers, this might be a great card.


Ta-da! We have some context, which is often woefully absent on many a fb (and other) PC/gaming forum.
But aside from VRAM being only part of the equation that throws frames around a screen (other board assets are just as important)

... There is the fact that last gen (which saw me opt for the 6800XT at it's May 2021 max price of £1200 and delivered in 3 days vs the 3080 10Gb ranging from £1800-2400 and stock TBA for months) Post that the 3080 wasn't too long in maxing that 10Gb of GDDR6X when the 6800XT often still had 2-3Gb of it's 16Gb GDDR6 on the table while matching frames. Tbh 10Gb is what the 3070 should've had (as the one I have here didn't hold up at 1440p for too long with 8Gb being 1080p level even 5 years ago nm 3) but we know how this side of things works for Nvidia by now. Anyway, once again real world numbers weren't the same as on paper, which gave 6X a 40-60% uplift over 6 depending on where you read.

Then again, I expect to see AMD get as much **** hanging in the mid range (for now, hopefully) as they did for competing very well in the high for half the price so that won't change.
 
RDOA 4: 16 giga when nvidea gives 24, DDR6 when nvidea gives D6X :(
Obvious troll is obvious.

You cant even spell properly. Nvidia only gives 24GB on 4090 that has a MSRP of $1600 and real world price of $1650 minimum. 1700+ in most places.

AMD gives 16GB for as low as $310 to $470. If we count their 24GB card then $899 - nearly half the price of 4090. And it's not DDR6 or D6X (I've never seen anyone use these acronyms). It's GDDR6 vs GDDR6X or G6 and G6X for short. G6X is also in short supply as Nvidia was forced to move RTX 4070 for G6X to G6.

Also ironic bringing up 16GB AMD when everyone has been complaining how stingy Nvidia is with VRAM. Their 16GB cards costs $440 and $960 respectively.
 
Nvidia only gives 24GB on 4090
no: 3090, 3090 Ti, RTX titan (from 6 years ago now ?), quadro P6000

AMD gives 16GB for as low as $310 to $470. If we count their 24GB card then $899 - nearly half the price of 4090.
you are getting half the price but you are also getting half the drivers :)

Also ironic bringing up 16GB AMD when everyone has been complaining how stingy Nvidia is with VRAM. Their 16GB cards costs $440 and $960 respectively.
I never say nvidea wasn't bich, I only say: AMD makes a new card that has less memory than a card relased by nvidea 6 years ago...if you don't get everything else I say, at least get that :)
 
no: 3090, 3090 Ti, RTX titan (from 6 years ago now ?), quadro P6000
I was counting only the latest generations from both. Both the RTX Titan and especially Quadro were not really gaming cards. And assuming we are not comparing gaming cards then AMD had 32-48GB professional cards back then. Yes in terms of gaming AMD had "only" 16GB vs 3090's 24GB.
you are getting half the price but you are also getting half the drivers :)
Ah this again. This claim has been debunked so many times in recent years it's not even funny anymore. You want to see half the drivers? Go look at Intel ARC launch...
I never say nvidea wasn't bich, I only say: AMD makes a new card that has less memory than a card relased by nvidea 6 years ago...if you don't get everything else I say, at least get that :)
By this definition Nvidia itself constantly releases cards that have less memory than one card they released six years ago. You also seem to be conveniently ignoring 7900 XTX that had 24GB. Nvidia's 4090 also had "only" 24GB.
 
Back